Community

Email Notifications

Another Approach to $700 Billion Bailout

Peter Miller, author of the Common-Sense Mortgage, has offered up some alternatives to the proposed $700 billion bailout plan. Below are excerpts from an article he wrote about these alternatives.

 

"One alternative is to simply offer low-interest loans to borrowers who currently have toxic mortgages.

"Figures developed by Rick Sharga, senior vice president at RealtyTrac, show that the likely cost of low interest loans would be roughly $220 billion — hardly cheap, but a lot less expensive than the $700 billion plan now being discussed in Washington.

"Sharga's figures look like this:

"Some 2.5 million homes are likely to be in the "process of foreclosure" during the coming 12 to 18 months. If a typical home has an average sale price of about $220,000 (many homes now facing foreclosure were financed several years ago with two loans, thus first loans are often significantly less than current market values), and if the average mortgage is $176,000 (80 percent of market values) then the total value of such mortgages would be $440 billion. If the refinancing program was limited to half of the homeowners who will probably lose their homes to foreclosure, Uncle Sam would need to provide loans worth $220 billion.

"(Another) alternative idea works like this: Instead of replacing loans, give lenders an amount equal to 15 percent of the mortgage principal in exchange for concessions. In other words, current loans would stay in place, there would be no principal reductions and lenders would not be forced to sell their paper in the midst of a declining market.

"Imagine if the average cost to modify a loan — that is, reduce the interest rate to something fixed for 30 years with no reduction in principal — was 15 percent of the loan amount or $26,400 ($176,000 x 0.15). Lenders accepting this money now would have to modify each current mortgage to a fixed rate established by Uncle Sam as well as a renewed 30-year term.

"Borrowers in this scenario would be required to share future appreciation 50/50 with Uncle Sam until the entire $26,400 was paid back at the time of sale. If a property was sold and the entire amount was not repaid, the borrower would be required to pay $500 a year until the debt was fully paid off. In effect, the pay-off system would resemble the concept approved over the summer for first-time home buyers, a system which provides a $7,500 tax credit up front that must be repaid when the property is sold."

Read full article.

What do you think?

Posted: Mon, September 29 2008 1:50 PM by darenb

Comments

Alex said:

These ideas may or may not be reasonable alternatives, but at least they ARE alternatives to the $700 billion bailout plan. Why doesn't Congress hold hearings and consider an array of ideas?

Thank you for the link.
# September 30, 2008 5:05 AM

Gary said:

Different ideas are good. Using tax payers money for "bailing out" ANYONE is wrong. I think the ones who profitted from their greed and caused the rest of us to suffer should be forced to pay back their bounty, go to prison AND be poor for their rest of their lives just like most of the working class will be. My wife and I struggle everyday to make all of our payments. We even have a little nest egg but why should we keep on when Uncle Sam will make your payments for you just because YOU made bad business decisions. The ability for the average American to afford even the basic staples of existence in this country is rapidly coming to an end. Our government is no longer representing the people who placed them there. It is way over due for another "Boston Tea Party"!! We need to ship almost all politicians and 99% of the lawyers to a deserted island with no means of leaving.
# October 3, 2008 6:45 AM

Bobbie Kraft said:

Thank you! You've substantiated the fact that what has taken place with the $700 Billion Bailout is a SCAM!
# October 6, 2008 2:09 PM

KC said:

Another approach is offer longer terms at same or lower fixed rates. This is not a new idea other countries use longer terms to help lower income people afford a home. Also loan money to troubled banks using mortgage as collateral; 10 cents to a dollar. This will force bankers to work with trouble borrowers so they can get the other 90 cents from that dollar.
# October 21, 2008 2:15 PM

Juice said:

It amazes me that a house somehow becomes more valuable as it ages, when a car loses value just rolling off the lot. It seems crazy that real estate history appraises itself higher and higher, with loan and bank companies and anyone else who runs with the pack feeding the fantasy. We need to return to reality, with home values that fit into the budget of hard working American families. Stop fanning the fantasy of the “American Dream” of owning an outrageous debt for the next 30 years.

# October 21, 2008 9:28 PM

Mike Scheu said:

God Bless America!

 

We need his help removing all those greedy devils in Washington. They have totally lost it. Could you imagine the mess we'd be in if all private industry acted as they do. As a real estate appraiser I saw this fiasco coming.

 

Seventy eight million baby boomers sucking the wealth out of there homes and social security being pilfered, we are in serious trouble.

 

Why bail out the banks who have never gone out of there way for the average working man? How do you get in such trouble with the amortization schedule currently used? How about changing the schedule to allow a quicker principle payoff, that way everyone can benefit not just those in trouble?

 

I agree with Gary, it is time to put the law benders back in school and teach them some logic and morals they too are sucking the wealth out of our society. I just hope my three young sons don't despise me and my generation for lack of combined action.

 

We are running out of time people, we need to stand up together and return the government to the people as our forefathers meant it to be. No more career politicians, we need successful private individuals to do a term for there country and go back to there place of business. Term limits to avoid collusion and inbred corruption.

 

They gave us $150 billion as a stimulus and now there are giving a select few almost five times that amount. What is wrong with this picture? Do they think we are that stupid?

 

Come on America lets join together and stand up to this Goliath and take our country back to the grandeur it had and all of us deserve.

 

Mike Scheu

# October 30, 2008 3:14 PM

shannon R. said:

As I forewarned most of my friends about this buyout plan, we now are beginning to see where this money is going and how it is not being used in the manner it was sold to our Congress.

 

It is actually being given to certain banking institutions who were supposed to begin lending practices in an effort to unfreeze the credit crisis. Well as told by angry people who voted against this buyout it is not being utilized as intended, instead these banks that are being awarded these funds are acquiring other troubled banking institutions in an attempt to become even larger and in essence are hoarding the money rather than lending it as intended initially.

 

We the American people were lied to again.

 

Shannon R.

# November 2, 2008 2:49 PM

Jeff in DC said:

I brought this up to Nouriel Roubini at a D.C. think tank event last week. His response was that the problem was never just housing.  It was a set of easy-credit asset bubbles spread throughout the global financial system.  

Jeff in D.C.

 

# November 6, 2008 6:54 AM

Ken Howard / AZ. said:

What if the feds just bought anyone's mortgage that wanted to participate in this program:

1. Fed buys your note, You now pay the Fed at a fixed 4% for 30 yrs. (Fed currently loans to investors aroun 2%,Correct).

 
2. Anyone who participates can NOT borrow against the property for 8 yrs or for as long as they own the property! It can only be sold to exit fed program!

This would allow the majority foreclosing home owners (the ones in subprime loans)to now afford there house. The neighbor is now 90-100% financed when he was only 70-80 two years ago. Now also benefits by reducing his payment, which frees up money for him to put in to our faltering economy.

Also wouldn't this now generate revenue for the Feds? Help the home owners themselves, ALL of them, Put consumer spent money into the economy, and make the fed more money that they now make lending to investor nexworks???

# November 12, 2008 12:19 PM

Ken Howard / AZ said:

Another idea!!

Again anyone who participates must AGREE to Borrow against their property again for a certain timeframe, 8 yrs or while they own the property.

My understanding is the Fed loans money to the investor who inter-loans it to the bank that holds your note!! Basiclly right???

What if all three of the parties agree to reduce their rate buy .5-.75.?

This could reduce home owner notes by 1.5 - 2.25%. Again wouldn't this save a lot of the foreclosure home owners and give extra, SPENDABLE cash for the struggling home owner?

All three parties of the loan process take small cuts, save homes and put money in people's hands for them to put into the economy, Go to dinner again, shopping, Buy a car from the limping auto manufacturers, turn their thermostates back on for the energy industry, buy tickets for air travel... so on and so on.

What am I missing???

# November 12, 2008 12:29 PM

Linda said:

Just how many of these homeowners were really duped into taking loans they couldn't afford?  The majority of the people I know who are having trouble and facing foreclosure leveraged themselves and used their homes as an ATM to finance extravagant life styles. They took money out of their homes for pricey cars, trips and other luxuries.  The demand for homes from investors and others who thought they could make a quick buck increased prices for everyone that bought.  

Allowing foreclosures will hurt home prices for everyone but we should let capitalism work and allow the chips to fall where they may.  If the government wants to help banks offer lower mortgage rates to everyone (with acceptable credit and means to pay back) then I'm okay with that but we need to stop rewarding the irresponsible that brought this crisis on in the first place.  
# November 19, 2008 8:02 AM

darenb said:

Linda,

Thank you for your comment.

Interestingly, it appears that capitalism is starting to work in some areas hardest-hit by foreclosures. (See this post: A Recovering Market without Govt Intervention as well as article in today's LA Times: "Santa Ana leads a bittersweet real estate boomlet.")

In these areas home prices have plummeted thanks to foreclsoures, but the prices have now fallen back to levels that buyers can truly afford and sales are picking up.

# November 19, 2008 11:17 AM

Andi said:

The bail out is a giant scam, with the fault lying with the banks making bad decisions, predatory lending, subprime lending, etc.They should bear the brunt of what they made happen,and get some of those billions they have given out for golden parachutes, and outrageous bonuses,  returned by the beneficiaries.

# December 28, 2008 10:22 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)